Darryl A. Goldberg
24/7 assistance | Se habla español
PLEASE NOTE: our office remains open and available to serve you during the COVID-19 crisis. We are attempting to limit in person consultations and offering our clients alternatives such as telephone consultations or via other confidential electronic means. We are available for in person meetings in limited and appropriate circumstances. Please call our office to discuss your options and rest assured we are continually working and here to help.

A closer look at federal drug crimes - II

In a previous post, we began discussing how the Controlled Substances Act classifies drugs into five separate schedules based on such factors as the drug's accepted medical use, potential for abuse and potential for addiction.

We also briefly touched on the fact that defendants facing drug charges at the federal level will spend more than in prison than their counterparts at the state level thanks to steep mandatory minimum sentences.

In today's post, we'll continue this discussion by examining more about the sentencing structure for federal drug crimes.

At the outset, it's important to differentiate between sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences. In the former, judges are permitted to consider specific factors about the defendant and the offense that they have committed before sentencing them to a prison term somewhere within a broadly predetermined range.

In the latter, judges are given virtually no discretion, meaning they may not hand down a sentence below an already high number of years, and are only able to consider the type and weight of the drug involved.     

The mandatory minimum sentencing scheme for federal drug crimes is the direct product of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which was passed by Congress in a period of relative hysteria over the possible spread of drug abuse and drug-related violence. Indeed, the fallacious belief was that steep mandatory minimum sentences would both put key figures in the drug trade behind bars and curb the rising drug abuse rates.

We'll continue this discussion in future posts, exploring some of the harsh mandatory minimum prison sentences handed down for federal drug trafficking.

It's imperative to consider speaking with an experienced legal professional as soon as possible if you have been arrested or are under investigation by federal law enforcement agencies for possible drug-related activities.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact us today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

This site uses Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA, which is subject to Google's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Connect with us

Darryl A. Goldberg
33 North Dearborn Street
Suite 1830
Chicago, IL 60602

Phone: 773-793-3196
Fax: 312-782-7074
Chicago Law Office Map

Email Us